petgraph/algo/dominators.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330
//! Compute dominators of a control-flow graph.
//!
//! # The Dominance Relation
//!
//! In a directed graph with a root node **R**, a node **A** is said to *dominate* a
//! node **B** iff every path from **R** to **B** contains **A**.
//!
//! The node **A** is said to *strictly dominate* the node **B** iff **A** dominates
//! **B** and **A ≠ B**.
//!
//! The node **A** is said to be the *immediate dominator* of a node **B** iff it
//! strictly dominates **B** and there does not exist any node **C** where **A**
//! dominates **C** and **C** dominates **B**.
use std::cmp::Ordering;
use std::collections::{hash_map::Iter, HashMap, HashSet};
use std::hash::Hash;
use crate::visit::{DfsPostOrder, GraphBase, IntoNeighbors, Visitable, Walker};
/// The dominance relation for some graph and root.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct Dominators<N>
where
N: Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
root: N,
dominators: HashMap<N, N>,
}
impl<N> Dominators<N>
where
N: Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
/// Get the root node used to construct these dominance relations.
pub fn root(&self) -> N {
self.root
}
/// Get the immediate dominator of the given node.
///
/// Returns `None` for any node that is not reachable from the root, and for
/// the root itself.
pub fn immediate_dominator(&self, node: N) -> Option<N> {
if node == self.root {
None
} else {
self.dominators.get(&node).cloned()
}
}
/// Iterate over the given node's strict dominators.
///
/// If the given node is not reachable from the root, then `None` is
/// returned.
pub fn strict_dominators(&self, node: N) -> Option<DominatorsIter<N>> {
if self.dominators.contains_key(&node) {
Some(DominatorsIter {
dominators: self,
node: self.immediate_dominator(node),
})
} else {
None
}
}
/// Iterate over all of the given node's dominators (including the given
/// node itself).
///
/// If the given node is not reachable from the root, then `None` is
/// returned.
pub fn dominators(&self, node: N) -> Option<DominatorsIter<N>> {
if self.dominators.contains_key(&node) {
Some(DominatorsIter {
dominators: self,
node: Some(node),
})
} else {
None
}
}
/// Iterate over all nodes immediately dominated by the given node (not
/// including the given node itself).
pub fn immediately_dominated_by(&self, node: N) -> DominatedByIter<N> {
DominatedByIter {
iter: self.dominators.iter(),
node,
}
}
}
/// Iterator for a node's dominators.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct DominatorsIter<'a, N>
where
N: 'a + Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
dominators: &'a Dominators<N>,
node: Option<N>,
}
impl<'a, N> Iterator for DominatorsIter<'a, N>
where
N: 'a + Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
type Item = N;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
let next = self.node.take();
if let Some(next) = next {
self.node = self.dominators.immediate_dominator(next);
}
next
}
}
/// Iterator for nodes dominated by a given node.
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
pub struct DominatedByIter<'a, N>
where
N: 'a + Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
iter: Iter<'a, N, N>,
node: N,
}
impl<'a, N> Iterator for DominatedByIter<'a, N>
where
N: 'a + Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
type Item = N;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
for next in self.iter.by_ref() {
if next.1 == &self.node {
return Some(*next.0);
}
}
None
}
fn size_hint(&self) -> (usize, Option<usize>) {
let (_, upper) = self.iter.size_hint();
(0, upper)
}
}
/// The undefined dominator sentinel, for when we have not yet discovered a
/// node's dominator.
const UNDEFINED: usize = ::std::usize::MAX;
/// This is an implementation of the engineered ["Simple, Fast Dominance
/// Algorithm"][0] discovered by Cooper et al.
///
/// This algorithm is **O(|V|²)**, and therefore has slower theoretical running time
/// than the Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm (which is **O(|E| log |V|)**. However,
/// Cooper et al found it to be faster in practice on control flow graphs of up
/// to ~30,000 vertices.
///
/// [0]: http://www.hipersoft.rice.edu/grads/publications/dom14.pdf
pub fn simple_fast<G>(graph: G, root: G::NodeId) -> Dominators<G::NodeId>
where
G: IntoNeighbors + Visitable,
<G as GraphBase>::NodeId: Eq + Hash,
{
let (post_order, predecessor_sets) = simple_fast_post_order(graph, root);
let length = post_order.len();
debug_assert!(length > 0);
debug_assert!(post_order.last() == Some(&root));
// From here on out we use indices into `post_order` instead of actual
// `NodeId`s wherever possible. This greatly improves the performance of
// this implementation, but we have to pay a little bit of upfront cost to
// convert our data structures to play along first.
// Maps a node to its index into `post_order`.
let node_to_post_order_idx: HashMap<_, _> = post_order
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, &node)| (node, idx))
.collect();
// Maps a node's `post_order` index to its set of predecessors's indices
// into `post_order` (as a vec).
let idx_to_predecessor_vec =
predecessor_sets_to_idx_vecs(&post_order, &node_to_post_order_idx, predecessor_sets);
let mut dominators = vec![UNDEFINED; length];
dominators[length - 1] = length - 1;
let mut changed = true;
while changed {
changed = false;
// Iterate in reverse post order, skipping the root.
for idx in (0..length - 1).rev() {
debug_assert!(post_order[idx] != root);
// Take the intersection of every predecessor's dominator set; that
// is the current best guess at the immediate dominator for this
// node.
let new_idom_idx = {
let mut predecessors = idx_to_predecessor_vec[idx]
.iter()
.filter(|&&p| dominators[p] != UNDEFINED);
let new_idom_idx = predecessors.next().expect(
"Because the root is initialized to dominate itself, and is the \
first node in every path, there must exist a predecessor to this \
node that also has a dominator",
);
predecessors.fold(*new_idom_idx, |new_idom_idx, &predecessor_idx| {
intersect(&dominators, new_idom_idx, predecessor_idx)
})
};
debug_assert!(new_idom_idx < length);
if new_idom_idx != dominators[idx] {
dominators[idx] = new_idom_idx;
changed = true;
}
}
}
// All done! Translate the indices back into proper `G::NodeId`s.
debug_assert!(!dominators.iter().any(|&dom| dom == UNDEFINED));
Dominators {
root,
dominators: dominators
.into_iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(idx, dom_idx)| (post_order[idx], post_order[dom_idx]))
.collect(),
}
}
fn intersect(dominators: &[usize], mut finger1: usize, mut finger2: usize) -> usize {
loop {
match finger1.cmp(&finger2) {
Ordering::Less => finger1 = dominators[finger1],
Ordering::Greater => finger2 = dominators[finger2],
Ordering::Equal => return finger1,
}
}
}
fn predecessor_sets_to_idx_vecs<N>(
post_order: &[N],
node_to_post_order_idx: &HashMap<N, usize>,
mut predecessor_sets: HashMap<N, HashSet<N>>,
) -> Vec<Vec<usize>>
where
N: Copy + Eq + Hash,
{
post_order
.iter()
.map(|node| {
predecessor_sets
.remove(node)
.map(|predecessors| {
predecessors
.into_iter()
.map(|p| *node_to_post_order_idx.get(&p).unwrap())
.collect()
})
.unwrap_or_default()
})
.collect()
}
type PredecessorSets<NodeId> = HashMap<NodeId, HashSet<NodeId>>;
fn simple_fast_post_order<G>(
graph: G,
root: G::NodeId,
) -> (Vec<G::NodeId>, PredecessorSets<G::NodeId>)
where
G: IntoNeighbors + Visitable,
<G as GraphBase>::NodeId: Eq + Hash,
{
let mut post_order = vec![];
let mut predecessor_sets = HashMap::new();
for node in DfsPostOrder::new(graph, root).iter(graph) {
post_order.push(node);
for successor in graph.neighbors(node) {
predecessor_sets
.entry(successor)
.or_insert_with(HashSet::new)
.insert(node);
}
}
(post_order, predecessor_sets)
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_iter_dominators() {
let doms: Dominators<u32> = Dominators {
root: 0,
dominators: [(2, 1), (1, 0), (0, 0)].iter().cloned().collect(),
};
let all_doms: Vec<_> = doms.dominators(2).unwrap().collect();
assert_eq!(vec![2, 1, 0], all_doms);
assert_eq!(None::<()>, doms.dominators(99).map(|_| unreachable!()));
let strict_doms: Vec<_> = doms.strict_dominators(2).unwrap().collect();
assert_eq!(vec![1, 0], strict_doms);
assert_eq!(
None::<()>,
doms.strict_dominators(99).map(|_| unreachable!())
);
let dom_by: Vec<_> = doms.immediately_dominated_by(1).collect();
assert_eq!(vec![2], dom_by);
assert_eq!(None, doms.immediately_dominated_by(99).next());
}
}